- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:47:39 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>, WebDav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Jim Whitehead wrote: > >> URI registrations for opaquelocktoken and DAV URI schemes made in RFC >> 2518 should still be considered active." >> > > While looking at the IANA considerations section, this text caught my eye: > > This document defines two namespaces, the namespace of property > names, and the namespace of WebDAV-specific XML elements used within > property values. > > I don't count two namespace, just one (DAV:). any objections if I fix > this sentence? Yes. This section defines namespaces (spaces of names), not XML namespaces. in fact, we have even more spaces of names in use: - in property values - in precondition/postcondition names - in resource types - in report names (RFC3253) - in ACEs (RFC3744) This probably means that we shouldn't list them all, but simply try to make a generaln statement how WebDAV uses XML-based identifiers in different contexts, and that usage of identifiers in the "DAV:" namespace is controlled by the IETF. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2005 07:48:01 UTC