Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis

At 12:09 AM +0100 12/20/05, Yves Lafon wrote:
>
>
>My implementation returns the ETag that asubsequent GET would see, so option (2). Ans I am in the case where the PUT entity and the served entity will not be the same, as there are CVS actions done during the PUT, so possible keyword extensions, etc...

Are these property changes, or changes to the entity itself?  If to the entity, how does a get-range work?
			regards,
					Ted Hardie

Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 23:20:19 UTC