w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 2005 by author

Bernard Desruisseaux

• draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt: DAV:quota-not-exceeded (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Question on bug 15 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• RFC2445bis: "424 Failed Dependency" missing in section "8.3.1 Status Codes for use with 207 (Multi-Status)" (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Monday, 17 October)
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-caldav-08.txt] (Tuesday, 4 October)

Blowfish

• limit user per ip in mod_dav (Friday, 21 October)

Brian Moseley

• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 20 October)

bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu

• [Bug 213] Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 212] Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 212] New: Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 213] New: Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 211] New: Inconsistencies about Destination header (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 179] DAV:no-lock (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 184] Clarifications requested for section 19.8 on hosting malicious content (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource) (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource) (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 179] DAV:no-lock (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Saturday, 31 December)
• [Bug 184] Clarifications requested for section 19.8 on hosting malicious content (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 184] Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 184] Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 207] Compliance class descriptions for "1" and "2" (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 209] invalid etag in example (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 210] incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties (Friday, 30 December)
• [Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2 (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2 (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Wednesday, 28 December)
• [Bug 142] URL_ENCODING_ISSUES (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 141] UNLOCK_WITHOUT_GOOD_TOKEN (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 138] UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 62] href format (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 52] "mandatory" properties (Tuesday, 27 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Thursday, 22 December)
• [Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 194] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COLLECTIONS (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 198] LOCK_ISSUES_SHARED_LOCKS (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix (Wednesday, 21 December)
• [Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates (Tuesday, 20 December)
• [Bug 187] Changes section organization (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 185] Missing interpunction in "previous authors" subsection (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 182] whitespace in lock token in example (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 180] Typo in 13.18, enhance reference (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 168] Revert to original reference style (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 88] typo in list (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 68] Reference to XML spec (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 57] incorrect section reference (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 30] incorrect XML in example (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 210] New: incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Sunday, 18 December)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 209] New: invalid etag in example (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 208] New: spec contradictory in ETag requirements (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Saturday, 17 December)
• [Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 134] PROPFIND_INFINITY (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 114] PUT_AND_INTERMEDIATE_COLLECTIONS (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 123] MULTISTATUS_FROM_MKCOL (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2 (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2 (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 117] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_1 (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Friday, 16 December)
• [Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops (Thursday, 15 December)
• [Bug 207] New: Compliance class descriptions for "1" and "2" (Thursday, 15 December)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Thursday, 15 December)
• [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 166] XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 127] PUT_ON_COLLECTION (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 125] COPY_INTO_YOURSELF_CLARIFY (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 157] REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 139] MUST_AN_IF_HEADER_CHECK_THE_ROOT_OF_URL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 159] ORDER_OF_HEADER_EVALUATION (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 163] REMOVE_NOT_SUPPORT_FROM_IF_HEADERS (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 162] REMOVE_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 161] EVALUATE_ALL_OF_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Tuesday, 13 December)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Tuesday, 13 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Tuesday, 13 December)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 205] new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 62] href format (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 205] new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 152] SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 152] SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Monday, 12 December)
• [Bug 206] New: broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties (Sunday, 11 December)
• [Bug 72] Review references section (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 169] Date header required? (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 62] href format (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 205] New: new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 148] SECTION_12_4_MENTIONS_HREF_ELEMENT (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 166] XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 181] error element (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 170] no mention of 424 in section 8.3.2 (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302 (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 165] DAV_ERROR_SUPPORT (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 135] RESOURCETYPE_EXTENSION (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 164] HOW_DOES_WEBDAV_SUPPORT_VARIANTS (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 137] OPTIONS_RESPONSE_VARIES_FOR_RESOURCES (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 153] CAN_HREF_BE_RELATIVE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 126] EXTEND_UNDEFINED (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 101] Extensibility for dav:owner (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 150] SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 60] If header evaluation when? (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 169] Date header required? (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 129] LOCK_BODY_SHOULD_BE_MUST (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 116] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ALL_TOO_STRONG (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 111] DEFINE_PRINCIPAL (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 192] LOCK_ISSUES_LOCK_URI_TYPE (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 146] PROP_ROUNDTRIP (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 191] LOCK_ISSUES_ACCESS_RIGHTS (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 190] HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 102] lock tokens in examples (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 87] broken XML source of spec (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 183] Outdated references (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 199] Front matter editorial nits (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 203] DAV:lockdiscovery in multistatus (8.11.8) (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 204] DAV:creationdate vs client sychronization (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 62] href format (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 60] If header evaluation when? (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Saturday, 10 December)
• [Bug 52] "mandatory" properties (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 204] New: DAV:creationdate vs client sychronization (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 203] New: DAV:lockdiscovery in multistatus (8.11.8) (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 202] New: Move description of lock-null resources into appendix (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 9 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Thursday, 8 December)
• [Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource) (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY (Tuesday, 6 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Monday, 5 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Sunday, 4 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Saturday, 3 December)
• [Bug 22] attributes on properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope" (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 59] failed LOCK response body (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 56] 423 Locked in Multistatus for PROPPATCH? (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 55] Multistatus format (empty) (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 52] "mandatory" properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 175] Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 175] Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 178] Multistatus for DELETE (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 128] LEVEL_OR_CLASS (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 91] chapter name for lock token uri schemes (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 128] LEVEL_OR_CLASS (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope" (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 90] broken RFC2277 reference (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 22] attributes on properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope" (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 72] Review references section (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 35] RFC2606 compliance (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Friday, 2 December)
• [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope" (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 173] Info about <location> inside multistatus lost (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Tuesday, 29 November)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Tuesday, 29 November)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Tuesday, 29 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Sunday, 27 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Sunday, 27 November)
• [Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens (Sunday, 27 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Sunday, 27 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Sunday, 27 November)
• [Bug 201] New: LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Sunday, 27 November)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 171] If header grammar (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 200] New: remove "bis" compliance class (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 199] New: Front matter editorial nits (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 67] non-ASCII characters (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 38] RFC2396bis update (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 38] RFC2396bis update (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 36] Appendix numbering (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 34] property "URI" (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 29] refreshing locks (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 20] lock token example (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Saturday, 26 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 60] If header evaluation when? (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 62] href format (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 49] propfind XML description incorrect (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 22] attributes on properties (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 62] href format (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 27] COPY vs live properties (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 27] COPY vs live properties (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 49] propfind XML description incorrect (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 27] COPY vs live properties (Friday, 25 November)
• [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Thursday, 24 November)
• [Bug 45] DAV request header (Thursday, 24 November)
• [Bug 43] "ill-formed" XML (Thursday, 24 November)
• [Bug 39] Syntax of property names in text content (Thursday, 24 November)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Thursday, 24 November)
• [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Thursday, 24 November)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 45] DAV request header (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 45] DAV request header (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 43] "ill-formed" XML (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 39] Syntax of property names in text content (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Wednesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 192] LOCK_ISSUES_LOCK_URI_TYPE (Tuesday, 22 November)
• [Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE (Tuesday, 22 November)
• [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 30] incorrect XML in example (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 57] incorrect section reference (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 68] Reference to XML spec (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 88] typo in list (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 88] typo in list (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 89] whitespace introduced into hyphenated words (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 168] Revert to original reference style (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 180] Typo in 13.18, enhance reference (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 182] whitespace in lock token in example (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 187] Changes section organization (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 185] Missing interpunction in "previous authors" subsection (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 122] LOCK_ISSUES (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 198] New: LOCK_ISSUES_SHARED_LOCKS (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 197] New: LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 196] New: LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 195] New: LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 194] New: LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COLLECTIONS (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 193] New: LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 192] New: LOCK_ISSUES_LOCK_URI_TYPE (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 191] New: LOCK_ISSUES_ACCESS_RIGHTS (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 189] New: "RFC2518bis" in spec text (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 66] references style (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 168] Revert to original reference style (Monday, 21 November)
• [Bug 188] New: PROPFIND include-dead-props (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 187] New: Changes section organization (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 186] New: opaquelocktoken appendix (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 185] New: Missing interpunction in "previous authors" subsection (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 184] New: Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 183] New: Outdated references (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 182] New: whitespace in lock token in example (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 181] New: error element (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 180] New: Typo in 13.18, enhance reference (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 179] New: DAV:no-lock (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 178] New: Multistatus for DELETE (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 177] New: "PROPFIND status codes" section (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 176] New: Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource) (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 175] New: Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 174] New: Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope" (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 173] New: Info about <location> inside multistatus lost (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Sunday, 20 November)
• [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 170] no mention of 424 in section 8.3.2 (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 169] Date header required? (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 167] XML_ENTITY_DOS (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 165] DAV_ERROR_SUPPORT (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 163] REMOVE_NOT_SUPPORT_FROM_IF_HEADERS (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 162] REMOVE_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 158] SHOULD_WE_SUPPORT_IRIS_AND_CHARMOD (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 157] REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 155] INTEROPERABILITY_OF_102PROCESSING_STATUS_DEMONSTRATED (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 153] CAN_HREF_BE_RELATIVE (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 151] HOW_DO_WE_ENCODE_FILENAMES_AS_URLS (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 142] URL_ENCODING_ISSUES (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 150] SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 148] SECTION_12_4_MENTIONS_HREF_ELEMENT (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 142] URL_ENCODING_ISSUES (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 137] OPTIONS_RESPONSE_VARIES_FOR_RESOURCES (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 135] RESOURCETYPE_EXTENSION (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 134] PROPFIND_INFINITY (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 130] IF_AND_AUTH (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 129] LOCK_BODY_SHOULD_BE_MUST (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 116] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ALL_TOO_STRONG (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 111] DEFINE_PRINCIPAL (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 102] lock tokens in examples (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 101] Extensibility for dav:owner (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 100] "Notes on HTTP Client Compatibility" useful? (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 98] new error code descriptions, continued (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 97] new error code descriptions (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 92] lock owner description (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 91] chapter name for lock token uri schemes (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 90] broken RFC2277 reference (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 89] whitespace introduced into hyphenated words (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 88] typo in list (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 87] broken XML source of spec (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 72] Review references section (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 68] Reference to XML spec (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 67] non-ASCII characters (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 66] references style (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 62] href format (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 60] If header evaluation when? (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 59] failed LOCK response body (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 57] incorrect section reference (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 56] 423 Locked in Multistatus for PROPPATCH? (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 55] Multistatus format (empty) (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 52] "mandatory" properties (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 49] propfind XML description incorrect (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 45] DAV request header (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 43] "ill-formed" XML (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 38] RFC2396bis update (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 35] RFC2606 compliance (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 30] incorrect XML in example (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 27] COPY vs live properties (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 22] attributes on properties (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite (Saturday, 19 November)
• [Bug 102] lock tokens in examples (Wednesday, 16 November)
• [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Wednesday, 16 November)
• [Bug 36] Appendix numbering (Wednesday, 16 November)
• [Bug 34] property "URI" (Wednesday, 16 November)
• [Bug 30] incorrect XML in example (Wednesday, 16 November)
• [Bug 29] refreshing locks (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 20] lock token example (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 20] lock token example (Sunday, 13 November)
• [Bug 61] invalid lock token in example (Sunday, 13 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 2 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 2 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 2 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 2 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 2 November)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 2 November)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Friday, 28 October)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 28 October)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Thursday, 27 October)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Thursday, 27 October)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Thursday, 27 October)
• [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Tuesday, 25 October)
• [Bug 172] New: Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Monday, 24 October)
• [Bug 151] HOW_DO_WE_ENCODE_FILENAMES_AS_URLS (Sunday, 23 October)
• [Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE (Sunday, 23 October)
• [Bug 171] New: If header grammar (Sunday, 23 October)
• [Bug 170] New: no mention of 424 in section 8.3.2 (Friday, 21 October)
• [Bug 169] New: Date header required? (Wednesday, 19 October)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 19 October)
• [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Tuesday, 18 October)
• [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 20] lock token example (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 168] New: Revert to original reference style (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Saturday, 15 October)
• [Bug 29] refreshing locks (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 36] Appendix numbering (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 36] Appendix numbering (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 34] property "URI" (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 34] property "URI" (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 34] property "URI" (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 30] incorrect XML in example (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 30] incorrect XML in example (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 29] refreshing locks (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 20] lock token example (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 22] attributes on properties (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 167] New: XML_ENTITY_DOS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 166] New: XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 165] New: DAV_ERROR_SUPPORT (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 164] New: HOW_DOES_WEBDAV_SUPPORT_VARIANTS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 163] New: REMOVE_NOT_SUPPORT_FROM_IF_HEADERS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 162] New: REMOVE_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 161] New: EVALUATE_ALL_OF_IF_HEADER (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 160] New: IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 159] New: ORDER_OF_HEADER_EVALUATION (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 158] New: SHOULD_WE_SUPPORT_IRIS_AND_CHARMOD (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 157] New: REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 156] New: HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 155] New: INTEROPERABILITY_OF_102PROCESSING_STATUS_DEMONSTRATED (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 154] New: ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 153] New: CAN_HREF_BE_RELATIVE (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 152] New: SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 151] New: HOW_DO_WE_ENCODE_FILENAMES_AS_URLS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 150] New: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 149] New: NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 148] New: SECTION_12_4_MENTIONS_HREF_ELEMENT (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 147] New: CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 146] New: PROP_ROUNDTRIP (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 145] New: LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 144] New: IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 143] New: LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 142] New: URL_ENCODING_ISSUES (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 141] New: UNLOCK_WITHOUT_GOOD_TOKEN (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 140] New: UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 139] New: MUST_AN_IF_HEADER_CHECK_THE_ROOT_OF_URL (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 138] New: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 137] New: OPTIONS_RESPONSE_VARIES_FOR_RESOURCES (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 136] New: LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 135] New: RESOURCETYPE_EXTENSION (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 134] New: PROPFIND_INFINITY (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 133] New: LOCK_SEMANTICS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 132] New: DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 131] New: DISPLAYNAME (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 130] New: IF_AND_AUTH (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 129] New: LOCK_BODY_SHOULD_BE_MUST (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 128] New: LEVEL_OR_CLASS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 127] New: PUT_ON_COLLECTION (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 126] New: EXTEND_UNDEFINED (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 125] New: COPY_INTO_YOURSELF_CLARIFY (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 124] New: REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 123] New: MULTISTATUS_FROM_MKCOL (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 122] New: LOCK_ISSUES (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 121] New: OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 120] New: DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 119] New: DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 118] New: WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2 (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 117] New: WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_1 (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 116] New: OVERWRITE_DELETE_ALL_TOO_STRONG (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 115] New: INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 114] New: PUT_AND_INTERMEDIATE_COLLECTIONS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 113] New: IMPLIED_LWS (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 112] New: MKCOL_AND_302 (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 111] New: DEFINE_PRINCIPAL (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 110] New: COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 109] New: CONSISTENCY (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 108] PROP_ATTR (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 108] New: PROP_ATTR (Thursday, 13 October)
• [Bug 107] New: Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 106] New: COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 105] New: COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 104] New: Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 103] New: Start of introduction for DELETE confusing (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 102] New: lock tokens in examples (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 101] New: Extensibility for dav:owner (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 100] New: "Notes on HTTP Client Compatibility" useful? (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 99] New: Risks Connected with Lock Tokens (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 98] New: new error code descriptions, continued (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 97] New: new error code descriptions (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 96] New: combining tagged list and untagged list (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 95] New: possible LOCK response codes (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 94] New: COPY and the Overwrite Header vs (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 93] New: Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 92] New: lock owner description (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 91] New: chapter name for lock token uri schemes (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 90] New: broken RFC2277 reference (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 87] New: broken XML source of spec (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 89] New: whitespace introduced into hyphenated words (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 88] New: typo in list (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 72] Review references section (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 39] Syntax of property names in text content (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 38] RFC2396bis update (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 36] Appendix numbering (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 35] RFC2606 compliance (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 34] property "URI" (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 33] Terminology in properties section (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 30] incorrect XML in example (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 29] refreshing locks (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 27] COPY vs live properties (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 22] attributes on properties (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 21] XML element definitions (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 20] lock token example (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names? (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253 (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 13] new ETag requirements (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 74] Remove UUID generation instructions (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 52] "mandatory" properties (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY" (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253 (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 49] propfind XML description incorrect (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 48] XML extensibility description (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 45] DAV request header (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 44] OPTIONS * (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 43] "ill-formed" XML (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 69] Formatting lost in appendix B.2 (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 68] Reference to XML spec (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 67] non-ASCII characters (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 66] references style (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 65] Table of Contents missing (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 62] href format (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 61] invalid lock token in example (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 60] If header evaluation when? (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 59] failed LOCK response body (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 57] incorrect section reference (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 56] 423 Locked in Multistatus for PROPPATCH? (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 55] Multistatus format (empty) (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 64] Incorrect IETF boilerplate (Monday, 3 October)
• [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Monday, 3 October)

Crompton, SY \(Shirley\)

• Re: unsubscribe s.y.crompton@dl.ac.uk (Tuesday, 13 December)

Cullen Jennings

• Schedule for finishing (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 171] If header grammar (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Thursday, 15 December)
• Was ... Re: [Bug 161] EVALUATE_ALL_OF_IF_HEADER (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Tomorrows call (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Concern about bugzilla SPAM (Tuesday, 13 December)
• New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Do server store arbitrary content (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 177] New: "PROPFIND status codes" section (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Twice Weekly Conference Call (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 177] New: "PROPFIND status codes" section (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 181] New: error element (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 24 November)
• Twice Weekly Conference Call (Thursday, 24 November)
• Notes on call from today ... (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Question on bug 15 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [Bug 184] New: Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 31 October)
• FW: [Inquiry #83038] Publication requested for draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-13 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Sunday, 30 October)
• Redirect draft status (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Sunday, 30 October)
• Bridge for this week (and hopefully other weeks too) (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 27 October)
• weekly bug phone call - moved to Thursday this week by popular request (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 22 October)
• Conference bridge for weekly bug phone call (Friday, 21 October)
• Phone call this Friday. (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: ideas for research on wbedav required (Friday, 7 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Friday, 7 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Recurring Thursday Conf call (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Conf call next Wednesday (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Tuesday, 4 October)

Dan Brotsky

• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)

david muller

• Re: ideas for research on wbedav required (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: ideas for research on wbedav required (Wednesday, 5 October)
• ideas for research on wbedav required (Wednesday, 5 October)

DigitallySmooth

• Re: [Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: OT but nice productivity hack: Yubnub to find RFCs, I-Ds and WGs (Thursday, 8 December)

edgar@edgarschwarz.de

• Re (2): last calling WebDAV mounting spec (Saturday, 1 October)

Elias Sinderson

• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Tomorrows call (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft (Friday, 9 December)
• Client comments? (was: [Bug 10] Round-tripping [...]) (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: GULP (Lock Semantics), was: Agenda for 12/6 telecon (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Agenda for 12/6 telecon (Tuesday, 6 December)
• agenda for 12/2 telecon (Friday, 2 December)
• Agenda for 11/30 telecon (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Issues for 11/25 Conference Call (notes) (Friday, 25 November)
• Issues for 11/24 Conference Call (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: BugZilla mail flood (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Thursday, 27 October)
• on our bug tracking (and closing) process (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: [Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 13 October)

Frank Lowney

• HTTP Upload (Thursday, 24 November)

Geoffrey M Clemm

• Re: [Bug 179] DAV:no-lock (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: Comments in XML-valued dead properties (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Bindings and permissions (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Question on bug 15 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Tuesday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Sunday, 23 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 6 October)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-09.txt (Thursday, 15 December)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-08.txt (Wednesday, 16 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-13.txt (Thursday, 13 October)

Jim Luther

• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: unsubscribe s.y.crompton@dl.ac.uk (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: limit user per ip in mod_dav (Friday, 21 October)

Jim Whitehead

• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Issues to address this coming week (Friday, 18 November)
• Fwd: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: on our bug tracking (and closing) process (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: new WebDAV python library (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: ideas for research on wbedav required (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: ideas for research on wbedav required (Wednesday, 5 October)

Joachim Feise

• Re: Forms-Based Authentication in DAV - Explore (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Question on bug 15 (Wednesday, 23 November)

Joe Orton

• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Sunday, 16 October)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt: DAV:quota-not-exceeded (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re-using 414 status codes (related to Bug 31) (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: New Security considerations (Saturday, 31 December)
• Feedback on Bug 18 (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list (Tuesday, 27 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Saturday, 24 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Thursday, 22 December)
• Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Bindings and permissions (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Sunday, 18 December)
• BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Question for implementors: definition of Lock with bindings (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Tomorrows call (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 13 December)
• [Fwd: RFC 4316 on Datatypes for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Properties] (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Friday, 9 December)
• Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 9 December)
• Implementations of draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Thursday, 8 December)
• GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Client comments? (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Thursday, 8 December)
• GULP (Lock Semantics), was: Agenda for 12/6 telecon (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: [Bug 171] If header grammar (Thursday, 1 December)
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-mount-03.txt] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Wednesday, 30 November)
• [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Agenda for 11/30 telecon (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Sunday, 27 November)
• Proposed changes (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: [Bug 184] New: Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 177] New: "PROPFIND status codes" section (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: HTTP Upload (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 24 November)
• ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Thursday, 24 November)
• More mainly editorial changes (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Fwd: [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: Fixes for editorial issues (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: [Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13 (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: Fixes for editorial issues (Monday, 21 November)
• Fixes for editorial issues (Monday, 21 November)
• BugZilla mail flood (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: Fwd: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: URI spec RFC2396 obsoleted by RFC3986 (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-url-constraints-00.txt] (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 3 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Tuesday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Monday, 24 October)
• If header list syntax, Re: Test cases for "If" header checks (Sunday, 23 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Sunday, 23 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Saturday, 22 October)
• Test cases for "If" header checks (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-mount-02.txt] (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: Problem implementing simple WebDAV Server (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: Phone call this Friday. (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Sunday, 16 October)
• new stuff in draft edits (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: [Bug 20] lock token example (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: [Bug 17] XML NS terminology (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Sunday, 16 October)
• Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Saturday, 15 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 15 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 15 October)
• Re: [Bug 37] Sentence lost in introduction (Saturday, 15 October)
• Re: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Friday, 14 October)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-13.txt (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Wednesday, 12 October)
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-mount-02.txt] (Tuesday, 11 October)
• Conf call on Thursday, Re: Conf call next Wednesday (Monday, 10 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Re: New draft of RFC2518bis (Monday, 3 October)
• REDIRECTREF issue "8.1_deep_lock_complexity", was: WGLC draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-12 (Saturday, 1 October)
• Re: Re (2): last calling WebDAV mounting spec (Saturday, 1 October)

Lisa Dusseault

• Re: draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt: DAV:quota-not-exceeded (Saturday, 31 December)
• New Security considerations (was: Re: [Bug 184] ) (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection (Thursday, 29 December)
• Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource (Thursday, 29 December)
• Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection (Thursday, 29 December)
• Comments in XML-valued dead properties (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME (Tuesday, 27 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Bindings and permissions (Saturday, 17 December)
• Question for implementors: definition of Lock with bindings (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Do server store arbitrary content (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties (Thursday, 8 December)
• OT but nice productivity hack: Yubnub to find RFCs, I-Ds and WGs (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Sunday, 4 December)
• Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Question on bug 15 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Fwd: [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: Fixes for editorial issues (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: Fixes for editorial issues (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: BugZilla mail flood (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Draft -08 RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 16 November)
• URI spec RFC2396 obsoleted by RFC3986 (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 3 November)
• XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 3 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Tuesday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• This Document Defines Two Namespaces (was Re: Combined set of issues ...) (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Sunday, 23 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent" (Saturday, 22 October)
• Combined set of issues around lock tokens, examples, schemes (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: new stuff in draft edits (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: [Bug 9] XML namespace discussion (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: Editing rfc2518bis.xml (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 13 October)
• Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV) (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 5 October)

Lukas Mathis

• RE: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings (Thursday, 8 December)
• RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Friday, 18 November)
• RE: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Problem implementing simple WebDAV Server (Thursday, 20 October)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Question on bug 15 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate (Wednesday, 2 November)

Ted Hardie

• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)
• Timeline for completion (Friday, 18 November)
• URI scheme removal/permanence (Friday, 28 October)

The IESG

• Document Action: 'Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Redirect Reference Resources' to Experimental RFC (Tuesday, 20 December)

vinod appajanna

• Forms-Based Authentication in DAV - Explore (Friday, 23 December)

Wilfredo Sánchez Vega

• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ... (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: Bugzilla issue 10, was: Plan to resolve issues in 2518bis (Wednesday, 5 October)

Yves Lafon

• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis (Monday, 19 December)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 December 2005 21:14:17 UTC