Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...

I agree with this proposal.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 11/24/2005 08:31:14 AM:

> So what I would propose is to
> 
> a) agree on a certain set of server features that those clients expect 
> (strong ETag on PUT, octet-for-octet identity of representations, ...), 
then
> 
> b) define a profile for WebDAV that covers this, and a simple way for 
> clients to discover whether any given resource supports this.
> 
> IMHO this definition should go into a separate document. This will also 
>   reduce the amount of open issues on RFC2518bis for now.