W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005


From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:46:37 -0800
Message-Id: <200512101746.jBAHkbGv009269@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org


julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added

------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2005-12-10 09:46 -------
I think draft 08 is very clear about this

"The lockdiscovery property returns a listing of who has a lock, what type of
lock he has, the timeout type and the time remaining on the timeout, and the
associated lock token. If there are no locks, but the server supports locks, the
property will be present but contain zero 'activelock' elements. If there is one
or more lock, an 'activelock' element appears for each lock on the resource."

So I recommend closing the issue.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2005 17:46:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:34 UTC