W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: XML InfoSet and property value preservation

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:01:53 +0100
Message-ID: <437995F1.6060106@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: WebDav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> 
> In WebDAV implementations today, the only InfoSet piece that we know 
> isn't always preserved on properties is the namespace prefix (and thus 
> the namespace declaration attributes might also be rewritten).   I'd 

I'm not sure how you can say that. I just tried with comments and PIs in 
Apache/moddav, and they aren't preserved. Do you have any data 
supporting your claim?

> assume we want to encourage new implementations to have at least as much 
> preservation/fidelity as existing implementations, and to make 
> implementations tend to be consistent with each other.  So why would we 
> allow servers to strip out stuff like comments?  If servers reliably 

Well, because commments are just that -- comments?

> preserve those today, I don't see why we'd explicitly allow those to 
> stop being preserved.

This I agree with, but it seems that we don't have the necessary 
supporting data.

> Is there some reason why we would choose to be lax on this in the 
> specification?

I don't want to be lax. We should either document what we have today (if 
we want to advance RFC2518), or document what we tjink would be good 
(staying at proposed). Throwing in things like PIs, but keeping out 
*essential* things like prefixes doesn't make any sense to me, though.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 08:02:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT