W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:59:20 -0800
Message-Id: <200512071959.jB7JxKMt002479@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140

lisa@osafoundation.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|joe-bugzilla@cursive.net    |lisa@osafoundation.org



------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2005-12-07 11:59 -------
The interoperable and actual practice here, is that servers don't require the
lock token to be in the If header when handling an UNLOCK.  We should add a note
about this and condoning this practice because it works in practice, even though
it's not consistent with the general rule that the "If" header is required with
a lock token in other cases of state-changing requests to locked resources.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:59:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT