W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 24] lost-update vs collections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:13:27 +0100
Message-ID: <436E63E7.8080603@gmx.de>
To: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Elias Sinderson wrote:
> 
> bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
> 
>> ------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2005-10-15 
>> 16:37 -------
>> Proposed text for -08:
>>
>>      When trying to lock a collection upon      creation, clients may 
>> attempt to increase the likelihood of this by      pipelining the 
>> MKCOL and LOCK requests together (but because this      doesn't 
>> convert two separate operations into one atomic operation      there's 
>> no guarantee this will work).
> I have no problems with the proposed text.

I'd prefer the spec not to say anything at all here (meaning the spec 
not to change from what RFC2518 said), but at least it's now technically 
correct, so just -0.5 on it.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2005 20:14:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT