Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"

Hi,

trying to summarize what we discussed in last week's call:

- discussion about relation with "Location" header needs to go (revert 
back to what RFC2518 said)

- we want to restrict what type of hrefs can occur in PROPFIND 
responses, relying on grammar definitions in RFC3986

- clients can expect that servers return URIs ("URI" as per 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.3>) or 
relative references consisting of just a path starting with a "/" 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.3.3>).

- segments of "." or ".." are forbidden

- me to make proposal for actual spec language (will need to check what 
part applies to PROPFIND and what part applies to the multistatus 
response format).

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 14:43:08 UTC