W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Question on bug 15

From: Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:23:17 -0500
Message-ID: <4384DDC5.7060809@oracle.com>
To: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Me too.

+1 for Proposal 1.

Cheers,
Bernard

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> 
> I agree with Stefan that we should stay consistent (i.e. +1
> for Proposal 1).
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> 
> 
> Stefan wrote on 11/23/2005 01:10:28 PM:
>  >
>  > Am 23.11.2005 um 19:05 schrieb Cullen Jennings:
>  >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I am going to call consensus on this one in a week so give me your
>  > > input
>  > > before then....
>  > >
>  > > The basic issue is that the names are sort of reverse what people think
>  > > because they are based on post conditions. ACL (and others) already
>  > > exists
>  > > and do it the reverse way. The question is we should we define future
>  > > stuff
>  > > in the "forward" way...
>  > >
>  > > Proposal 1: Stay consistent with ACL - put in note for implementers
>  > > that
>  > > points out this is reverse of what they might expect.
>  >
>  > +1.
>  >
>  > > Proposal 2: Switch the way we do it. Leave old document reverse and
>  > > make new
>  > > documents forward.
>  >
>  > -1.
>  >
>  >
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 21:23:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT