W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:53:17 -0800
To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF8BA81D.5D934%fluffy@cisco.com>

Thanks - Well if that's the case, seem like an argument that everything that
needs saying has already been said.


On 10/31/05 4:16 AM, "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> You would do the same as what you would always do with a Location
> header in a response, i.e., use the URL specified in the Location header
> the next time you wanted to apply a method to the resource.
> 
> Cheers, 
> Geoff 
> 
> Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote on 10/30/2005 02:53:15 PM:
> 
>> > On 10/28/05 8:24 PM, "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > +1 for either Jim's suggested text or saying nothing,
>>> > > and +1 that we then close this issue.
>>> > > 
>>> > > Cheers, 
>>> > > Geoff 
>> > 
>> > So I am a client implementer, should I do anything with the Location header
>> > in a 207 or should I just always ignore it?
>> > 
> 
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 18:53:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT