W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:37:54 -0800
Message-Id: <26dcc10da7f6145cb2ce36510ce9e206@osafoundation.org>
Cc: WebDav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>

On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:05 AM, Yves Lafon wrote:
> The discussion boils down to:
> After a PUT, is it safe to continue to edit the resource without doing 
> a reload?
> And the server should give the answer. 205 if it is not safe, 204 
> otherwise, with the ETag that someone will get in a subsequent GET.
Thanks Yves, I can't believe nobody noticed the relevance of 205 
earlier in these discussions.  It would indeed be a good response to 
use and could even include an ETag if we define what that means.

Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 16:41:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:34 UTC