W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:26:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4359F79D.4010500@gmx.de>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
CC: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Cullen Jennings wrote:
> Another ignorant questions but ... Do existing servers include Locations
> headers. For any generic header X, if servers use it or clients expect it,
> then I would hope the spec talked about what needed to be in header X. If no
> one uses header X (and sound like you are saying it is hard to imagine
> anyone uses since no one knows what it means) then the spec should ignore it
> or say not to use it.

As far as I can tell, returning a "Location" response header with status 
207 is completely meaningless, and I'm not aware of any server doing that.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 22 October 2005 08:26:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:10 GMT