W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:22:44 -0800
Message-Id: <200512100022.jBA0Miqs006081@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60

lisa@osafoundation.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2005-12-09 16:22 -------
Jim and I tried to clarify the paragraph as a whole.  suggested:

      Note that use of Lock-Token header to 
      provide the lock token is not consistent with other state-changing methods 
      which all require an If header with the lock token. Thus, the If header 
      is not needed to provide the lock token.  Naturally when the If header is 
      present it has its normal meaning as a conditional header.  




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2005 00:23:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT