W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]

From: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@wsanchez.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:41:18 -0800
Message-Id: <3A5692B0-16F3-493A-9892-7E7937B65F24@wsanchez.net>
Cc: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>


   Ah, that's what I was looking for.  Thanks.

	-wsv


On Dec 9, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> A strong ETag allows you to do GET with Range headers, while a weak  
> ETag doesn't.

Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 21:41:58 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Elias Sinderson: "Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT