Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags] from Wilfredo Sánchez Vega on 2005-12-09 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 2005)

From: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@wsanchez.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:41:18 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3A5692B0-16F3-493A-9892-7E7937B65F24@wsanchez.net>

   Ah, that's what I was looking for.  Thanks.

	-wsv


On Dec 9, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> A strong ETag allows you to do GET with Range headers, while a weak  
> ETag doesn't.

Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 21:41:58 UTC