W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005


From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:19:32 -0800
Message-Id: <200512211819.jBLIJW5J014944@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org


elias@cse.ucsc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

------- Additional Comments From elias@cse.ucsc.edu  2005-12-21 10:19 -------
The existing text (section 6.1) seems to offer satisfactory explanation for the
existence of lock-null resources, and additional justification regarding shared
editing sessions was provided in the 12/21 telecon. Rather than add additional
justification to 2518-bis, we are going to let this issue lie and resolve it as
a 'WONTFIX'. Further, the issue of /shared read locks/ is beyond the scope of
the current WG charter to finish 2518-bis...

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 18:19:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:34 UTC