W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:03:16 -0800
Message-Id: <200512122003.jBCK3Gqo022357@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95





------- Additional Comments From ejw@cs.ucsc.edu  2005-12-12 12:03 -------
It makes sense to keep the final sentence in, since it makes it clear when the 424 is returned. However, 
then sentence does need to have a statement about how required it is. Choices are MAY, SHOULD, MUST.

MAY: IMO, too weak
SHOULD: could live with it, but implies there may be reasons a server wouldn't do this. I can't think of any 
such cases
MUST: seems to describe desired behavior, and makes a clear statement. 

Hence, I lean toward using MUST here.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 20:03:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT