W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Agenda for 11/30 telecon

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:47:38 +0100
Message-ID: <438CA24A.8010301@gmx.de>
To: Elias Sinderson <elias@soe.ucsc.edu>
CC: webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Elias,

thanks for the agenda.

I've worked on some of the issues, attendees of the conference call (and 
of course everybody else) may want to check the following proposed 
changes (maybe having spec-ready text will help resolving these issues 
quickly).

In particular:

> 172 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172> - 
> Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (consensus 
> issue)

<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#opaquelocktoken>

> 10 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10> - 
> Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
>        (Need to hammer out text, as none has been proposed)

<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#property_values>

> Minor:
> 186 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186> - 
> opaquelocktoken appendix
>          (Perhaps resolved in earlier discussion of issue 172.)

(again) 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#opaquelocktoken>

> Trivial:
> 174 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174> - 
> Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
>          (Should be easy to reach consensus.)

gone with the proposed rewrite 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#property_values>)

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:50:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT