Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis

   Yeah, but I don't think I could sell that implementation to the  
rest of httpd-dev, even optionally.

	-wsv


On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote:
>>   I don't see how that would help.  For one, I suspect may clients  
>> will ask for this all the time, so then why not do it for all  
>> clients all the time?  I'm not opposed to giving you the strong  
>> ETag, I just don't know how to do it.
>
> You could do it for the case of PUT by pausing for 1 second, right?  
> This is exactly why I wouldn't want that to be the default.

Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 00:58:39 UTC