W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis

From: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@wsanchez.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:56:16 -0800
Message-Id: <D1BAEB14-DE96-47C6-886B-FF9CCAC02DCC@wsanchez.net>
Cc: Dan Brotsky <dbrotsky@adobe.com>, Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>, WebDav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

   Yeah, but I don't think I could sell that implementation to the  
rest of httpd-dev, even optionally.

	-wsv


On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote:
>>   I don't see how that would help.  For one, I suspect may clients  
>> will ask for this all the time, so then why not do it for all  
>> clients all the time?  I'm not opposed to giving you the strong  
>> ETag, I just don't know how to do it.
>
> You could do it for the case of PUT by pausing for 1 second, right?  
> This is exactly why I wouldn't want that to be the default.
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 00:58:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:12 GMT