W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:56:40 -0800
To: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
CC: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF8BA8E8.5D935%fluffy@cisco.com>

Unless more than one person objects in the next week, I'm going to invoke
one of my rare Chair privileges and claim that looks like consensus to me

On 10/31/05 10:05 AM, "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu> wrote:

> However, I still think the right action here is:
> * Create a new appendix in 2518bis
> * In this appendix, document the problem
> * Describe the known approaches for addressing the problem (If approach,
> 100-continue approach) and their issues
> * Create a separate draft focusing just on the Force-Authenticate approach,
> and discuss on HTTP-WG list.
> Julian seems to think this is an OK approach. Geoff seems to think this is OK.
> Jim Luther agrees with the separate draft part.
> Dang if that doesn't seem like something approaching rough consensus to me.
> - Jim
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 19:01:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:33 UTC