W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:56:40 -0800
To: Jim Whitehead <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu>, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
CC: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF8BA8E8.5D935%fluffy@cisco.com>

Unless more than one person objects in the next week, I'm going to invoke
one of my rare Chair privileges and claim that looks like consensus to me
too.

On 10/31/05 10:05 AM, "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@soe.ucsc.edu> wrote:

> However, I still think the right action here is:
> 
> * Create a new appendix in 2518bis
> * In this appendix, document the problem
> * Describe the known approaches for addressing the problem (If approach,
> 100-continue approach) and their issues
> * Create a separate draft focusing just on the Force-Authenticate approach,
> and discuss on HTTP-WG list.
> 
> Julian seems to think this is an OK approach. Geoff seems to think this is OK.
> Jim Luther agrees with the separate draft part.
> 
> Dang if that doesn't seem like something approaching rough consensus to me.
> 
> - Jim
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 19:01:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT