W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:00:11 -0800
Message-Id: <200512122000.jBCK0Bru022324@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org


------- Additional Comments From ejw@cs.ucsc.edu  2005-12-12 12:00 -------
> ..."MAY" is incorrect here, because we aren't defining anything here... Also, if
> we refer to RFC3253, we'd better also state the exact place (here: Section 1.7).

I agree. Use "can" or "will" instead.

> I don't think this is allowed. The membership should be always the one of the
> source namespace, unless I'm missing something.

This is what I thought -- the merge behavior is not what was previously in RFC 2518.

> That's correct, but only for the first of the two reasons.

I don't understand this. Are you suggesting a change?

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 20:00:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:34 UTC