W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings

From: Lukas Mathis <lukas.mathis@numcom.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:14:57 +0100
Message-ID: <60897A0F7690ED43A1E0995D0534F8FB040100@daddy.numcom.local>
To: "WebDav" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

> In this situation, is a lock token required to DELETE /foo/b? 
> GULP's answer to that one is that you don't need the lock 
> token. (...) 
> On the other hand, a PUT or a PROPPATCH applied to /foo/b 
> will require the lock token because it affects the state of 
> resource Z.

Makes sense to me. +1.



-- 
Lukas Mathis, Numcom Software AG
Hardturmstrasse 66, CH-8005 Zürich
Direct +41(0)43-204 06 08
mailto:lukas.mathis@numcom.com, http://www.numcom.com/
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:15:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT