W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Appropriate partial success codes (was Re: Some questions about WebDAV)

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:52:13 -0700
Message-Id: <9dc6e971976e25239bf62723c2b04dec@osafoundation.org>
Cc: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

To respond specifically to the question about resolving issues, the 
text was added in an attempt to comprehensively respond to an issue 
that was raised on the mailing list by ChunWei Ho on July 20.  I 
thought that your answer to ChunWei Ho's question was perfectly 
correct, and that info wasn't unambiguously stated in the RFC, so I 
tried to answer that question and also questions about other status 
codes besides 412 appearing in Multi-Status responses (some of them are 
more subtle than whether or not 412 should appear).  I'm not tied to 
any of the specific recommendations I made in that section -- consider 
it straw-man text.  Have you any changes to recommend in it?

Lisa


On Oct 17, 2005, at 2:35 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Cullen Jennings wrote:
>> Do you really think this should be removed from the final RFC? On the 
>> call
>> the other day I though you were going to do some testing and come up 
>> with
>> some modifications for this text?
>
> No, I think this is a misunderstanding. I really feel this text is 
> both misleading, and doesn't resolve any issue I'm aware of.
>
> I'd really like all of us to agree on the approach not to make any 
> changes in the original spec unless we have a well-defined issue, and 
> working group consensus how to resolve it. If it ain't broke, don't 
> fix it.
>
> Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 18:52:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:10 GMT