Sunday, 31 March 2013
Saturday, 30 March 2013
Friday, 29 March 2013
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- RE: Header compression: header set diff
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- Re: p6: Returning the freshest response
- p6: Returning the freshest response
Thursday, 28 March 2013
- WGLC: p5 editorial nits
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics section 3.1.3.1 confusion
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
Wednesday, 27 March 2013
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
- WGLC: p4 editorial nits
- Re: INVALID_STREAM and STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED
- Re: REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: INVALID_STREAM and STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED
- Re: REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: INVALID_STREAM and STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED
- Re: REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: INVALID_STREAM and STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED
- INVALID_STREAM and STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED
- REFUSED_STREAM and CANCEL
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- RE: HeaderDiff specification
- 答复: HeaderDiff specification
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
Monday, 25 March 2013
- WGLC: p6 editorial nits
- Re: Project idea
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Header compression: header set diff
- RE: Header compression: header set diff
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Project idea
- Re: DNS record support and draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: DNS record support and draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22, "2.2 Protection Space (Realm)"
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22, "2.2 Protection Space (Realm)"
- DNS record support and draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
Saturday, 23 March 2013
Friday, 22 March 2013
- Re: Header compression: header set diff
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Updated delta-encoding of values
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- RE: Header compression: buffer management
- RE: Header compression: buffer management
- RE: Header compression: header set diff
- RE: Header compression: header set diff
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Header compression: buffer management
- Re: Header compression: buffer management
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
Thursday, 21 March 2013
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: Header compression: header set diff
- Re: Header compression: header set diff
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Header compression: buffer management
- Re: Header compression: header set diff
- Re: Header compression: header set diff
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Header compression: buffer management
- Re: Header compression: buffer management
- Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Header compression: buffer management
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- Re: Header compression: header set diff
- Header compression: buffer management
- Header compression: header set diff
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- RE: Choosing a header compression algorithm
- Re: Working Group Last Call on the HTTPbis document set
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- Choosing a header compression algorithm
- RE: Dealing with bad server chunking
Wednesday, 20 March 2013
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- RE: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22, "2.2 Protection Space (Realm)"
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- Delta I-D update feedback
Tuesday, 19 March 2013
- WGLC: p1 editorial nits
- Re: Host header with an empty value?
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: Host header with an empty value?
- Re: WGLC: p7 editorial nits
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- WGLC: p7 editorial nits
- Re: WGLC issue: token68 in p7
- WGLC issue: token68 in p7
Monday, 18 March 2013
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22, "2.2 Protection Space (Realm)"
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22, "2.2 Protection Space (Realm)"
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22, "2.2 Protection Space (Realm)"
- draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22, "2.2 Protection Space (Realm)"
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-22
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-06
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-22
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-22
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-22
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-11
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-06
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- HeaderDiff draft
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Planning for Future Meetings
Sunday, 17 March 2013
- WGLC p6 4.2.1
- Re: Dealing with bad server chunking
- Working Group Last Call on the HTTPbis document set
- Minutes from Orlando
- Re: delta compression I-D 01
- Re: delta compression I-D 01
Saturday, 16 March 2013
- Re: Host header with an empty value?
- Re: Host header with an empty value?
- Re: Host header with an empty value?
- Host header with an empty value?
Friday, 15 March 2013
- Re: delta compression I-D 01
- RE: Dealing with bad server chunking
- ALPN OpenSSL implementation
- Cisco Research looking for proposals to analyze HTTP 2.0
- Re: Dealing with bad server chunking
- Re: Dealing with bad server chunking
- Re: Dealing with bad server chunking
- Re: Dealing with bad server chunking
- Reminder: WG meeting today
- Re: Dealing with bad server chunking
- Re: Dealing with bad server chunking
- Dealing with bad server chunking
Thursday, 14 March 2013
- Re: Project idea
- Re: iwebpp.io announce - run peer/p2p web service with Node.js
- Re: Project idea
- Re: iwebpp.io announce - run peer/p2p web service with Node.js
- Re: iwebpp.io announce - run peer/p2p web service with Node.js
- Project idea
Wednesday, 13 March 2013
- Re: Proposed text for "Routing Data's relationship to headers" (Issue 23)
- Re: iwebpp.io announce - run peer/p2p web service with Node.js
- Re: delta compression I-D 01
- Re: delta compression I-D 01
- Re: delta compression I-D 01
- delta compression I-D 01
- Proposed text for "Routing Data's relationship to headers" (Issue 23)
- iwebpp.io announce - run peer/p2p web service with Node.js
- Re: [HTTP/1.1] method length and 501 Not Implemented
Tuesday, 12 March 2013
- Re: [HTTP/1.1] method length and 501 Not Implemented
- Re: [HTTP/1.1] method length and 501 Not Implemented
- Re: [HTTP/1.1] method length and 501 Not Implemented
- Re: [HTTP/1.1] method length and 501 Not Implemented
- [HTTP/1.1] method length and 501 Not Implemented
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-mget-00.txt
- Re: "In the wild" use case for Accept-Charset with parameters; musings on a modern alternative
- "In the wild" use case for Accept-Charset with parameters; musings on a modern alternative
Monday, 11 March 2013
- RE: Maximum Frame Size
- Re: Maximum Frame Size
- Re: Maximum Frame Size
- RE: Maximum Frame Size
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Talking to yourself
- Complete Request Flow
Friday, 8 March 2013
- Re: The document's address
- Re: The document's address
- Re: The document's address
- Re: The document's address
- Re: The document's address
- Re: The document's address
- Re: The document's address
Thursday, 7 March 2013
- Re: Preference-Applied Response Header
- Re: Preference-Applied Response Header
- Re: Preference-Applied Response Header
- Preference-Applied Response Header
- Re: Intercepting proxies - yet again
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Intercepting proxies - yet again
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
Wednesday, 6 March 2013
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- RE: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01, "4.2.3 Authentication"
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01, "4.2.3 Authentication"
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01, "4.2.3 Authentication"
Tuesday, 5 March 2013
Monday, 4 March 2013
- Maximum Frame Size
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
Sunday, 3 March 2013
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Header field-name token and leading spaces
- Re: Header field-name token and leading spaces
- Re: Header field-name token and leading spaces
- Re: Header field-name token and leading spaces
- Header field-name token and leading spaces
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
Saturday, 2 March 2013
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
Friday, 1 March 2013
Thursday, 28 February 2013
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- RE: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- RE: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: WGLC issue: ambiguity in part 1 example
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Giving the Framing Layer a real name
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Can't see error codes in HTML version of http://http2.github.com/http2-spec/#RST_STREAM
- Can't see error codes in HTML version of http://http2.github.com/http2-spec/#RST_STREAM
- Re: WGLC issue: ambiguity in part 1 example
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: WGLC issue: ambiguity in part 1 example
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #41: Header Block field name length
- RE: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Memento Internet Draft, new version
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- RE: #41: Header Block field name length
- RE: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: #43: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: #43: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: #41: Header Block field name length
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- #43: SYN_REPLY
Monday, 25 February 2013
- #41: Header Block field name length
- Re: Permitted characters for http keys
- Re: Permitted characters for http keys
- RE: HeaderDiff specification
- Re: Permitted characters for http keys
- Re: Permitted characters for http keys
- Re: Permitted characters for http keys
- Draft agenda for Orlando
- Issues addressed in the -22 drafts
- Re: Using Github for HTTP2
Sunday, 24 February 2013
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- RE: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
Saturday, 23 February 2013
- Re: Constant priotrity (Was: SYN_REPLY)
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-06.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-11.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-22.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-22.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-22.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-22.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-22.txt
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the
Friday, 22 February 2013
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- RE: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: Using Github for HTTP2
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- RE: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Using Github for HTTP2
- Re: HeaderDiff specification
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- HTML Form HTTP Extensions
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr-01.txt
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: HeaderDiff specification
- Re: Constant priotrity (Was: SYN_REPLY)
- HeaderDiff specification
- Re: #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Constant priotrity (Was: SYN_REPLY)
- PUT, If-Match, 412 - over-constrained?
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- #40 - HTTP2 default value for client supported max_concurrent_streams
- #38 - HTTP2 min value for server supported max_concurrent_streams
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: [httpbis] #432: Review Cachability of Status Codes WRT "Negative Caching"
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
Thursday, 21 February 2013
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: SYN_REPLY
- Re: Streaming layer in HTTP/2.0
- SYN_REPLY
- Streaming layer in HTTP/2.0
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: Removing CREDENTIAL
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Upgrade status for impl draft 1
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: Removing CREDENTIAL
- Removing CREDENTIAL
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Interaction of WINDOW_UPDATE and SETTINGS for Flow Control
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: Permitted characters for http keys
- Permitted characters for http keys
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- #433, was: WGLC issue: ambiguity in part 1 example
- #434: mention in header field considerations that leading/trailing WS is lossy
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
Monday, 18 February 2013
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-03.txt
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: HTTP/2.0 #19: Clarify that max-streams is per-direction [WAS: Outstanding Action Items]
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: [httpbis] #432: Review Cachability of Status Codes WRT "Negative Caching"
- HTTP/2.0 #19: Clarify that max-streams is per-direction [WAS: Outstanding Action Items]
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: [httpbis] #432: Review Cachability of Status Codes WRT "Negative Caching"
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Outstanding Action Items
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Outstanding Action Items
- Re: Outstanding Action Items
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: WGLC issue: ambiguity in part 1 example
- Re: [httpbis] #432: Review Cachability of Status Codes WRT "Negative Caching"
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: HTTP/1.1 #223: Allowing heuristic caching for new status codes
Sunday, 17 February 2013
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- WGLC issue: ambiguity in part 1 example
Saturday, 16 February 2013
- Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Multi-GET, extreme compression?
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Caching 412 responses
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
Friday, 15 February 2013
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: How to determine server's decoding capability before sending entity?
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- How to determine server's decoding capability before sending entity?
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
Thursday, 14 February 2013
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- A mechanism to encode HTTP version information in DNS
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Updated BOHE I-D...
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: HTTP Origin and Hop Hints and Prefer Header
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- HTTP Origin and Hop Hints and Prefer Header
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: HTTP 2.0 next steps and TLS next protocol negotiation
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: HTTP 2.0 next steps and TLS next protocol negotiation
- HTTP 2.0 next steps and TLS next protocol negotiation
Monday, 11 February 2013
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- RE: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Unicode sucks, get over it (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Unicode sucks, get over it (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- RE: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: #431: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: Unicode sucks, get over it (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Fwd: [httpbis] #432: Review Cachability of Status Codes WRT "Negative Caching"
- HTTP/1.1 #223: Allowing heuristic caching for new status codes
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Stateful compression of cookies (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Unicode sucks, get over it (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
Sunday, 10 February 2013
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Unicode sucks, get over it (Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values)
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: #431: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: Using Github for HTTP2
- Re: #431: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: #431: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Using Github for HTTP2
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Using Github for HTTP2
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- proposed WINDOW_UPDATE text for session flow control windows
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Using Github for HTTP2
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
Saturday, 9 February 2013
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
Friday, 8 February 2013
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: #431: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Delta Compression and UTF-8 Header Values
- Re: #431: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Using Github for HTTP2
Thursday, 7 February 2013
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: httpbis - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 86
- Fwd: httpbis - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 86
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Minutes from the Tokyo interim meeting
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- New version of [TLS} Application Layer Protocol Negotiation
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- RE: Outstanding Action Items
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: Outstanding Action Items
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
- Re: Outstanding Action Items
- Framing and control-frame continuations
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: Outstanding Action Items
- Re: Outstanding Action Items
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Re: Next Steps for HTTP/2.0
- Re: Next Steps for HTTP/2.0
- Request Routing Information [was: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?]
- Lucky 13 TLS Attack...
- Outstanding Action Items
- Next Steps for HTTP/2.0
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Minutes from the Tokyo interim meeting
Monday, 4 February 2013
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- Re: http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
- http/2 prioritization/fairness bug with proxies
Sunday, 3 February 2013
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6266 (3475)
Saturday, 2 February 2013
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- #431: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
Friday, 1 February 2013
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- Re: URI path starting with "//"
- URI path starting with "//"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Methods unique token Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Methods unique token Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Methods unique token Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Methods unique token Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- Re: HTTP/2.0 Magic
- HTTP/2.0 Magic
Thursday, 31 January 2013
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- RE: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- RE: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- RE: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- RE: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- #430 / #268 - definition of "public"
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
- Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?
Tuesday, 29 January 2013
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
Monday, 28 January 2013
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: can a conditional header field put conditions on resources other than the target resource?
- Re: can a conditional header field put conditions on resources other than the target resource?
- Re: can a conditional header field put conditions on resources other than the target resource?
- Re: http/2 flow control
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: [httpbis] #223: Allowing heuristic caching for new status codes
Sunday, 27 January 2013
- Re: can a conditional header field put conditions on resources other than the target resource?
- Re: [httpbis] #223: Allowing heuristic caching for new status codes
Friday, 25 January 2013
- Re: can a conditional header field put conditions on resources other than the target resource?
- Re: can a conditional header field put conditions on resources other than the target resource?
- can a conditional header field put conditions on resources other than the target resource?
- Re: #96 Conditional GET text
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- #96 Conditional GET text
- Re: http/2 flow control
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"
- Header compression: http1_huffman
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- RE: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
Thursday, 24 January 2013
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: http/2 flow control
- Re: http/2 flow control
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- http/2 flow control
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Types of Web Service
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Types of Web Service
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Types of Web Service
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"
Wednesday, 23 January 2013
- Re: Status of 308 Status Code draft
- Status of 308 Status Code draft
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- state management on connections
- RE: Header Stats
- HTTP/2.0 Max Frame Size
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: Header Stats
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Header Stats
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-wilde-xml-patch-00.txt
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- Re: How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
- How to stop receiving a pushed resource? (I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt)
Monday, 21 January 2013
- -01 posted
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-01.txt
- Re: Interim Meeting - next week
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- RE: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Interim Meeting - next week
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Sunday, 20 January 2013
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
- Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
- Re: Lingering Close
- Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
- Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Lingering Close
- #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
Saturday, 19 January 2013
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: Cache-Cache and Binary Encoding
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
Friday, 18 January 2013
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Cache-Cache and Binary Encoding
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- Set-Cookie and Cookie Optimized Binary Encoding
- RE: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- RE: bohe and delta experimentation...
- RE: delta encoding and state management
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The document's address
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: The document's address
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
Thursday, 17 January 2013
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- RE: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- Re: Heuristic caching without validators
- Re: Heuristic caching without validators
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: delta encoding and state management
- delta encoding and state management
- Re: Heuristic caching without validators
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: Heuristic caching without validators
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: Some general thought on CRIME and Compression and Headers
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Heuristic caching without validators
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
- bohe and delta experimentation...
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
- RE: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
Tuesday, 15 January 2013
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Draft agenda for Interim Meeting
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
Monday, 14 January 2013
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Session Continuation at WebSec
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: Some general thought on CRIME and Compression and Headers
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff)
Saturday, 12 January 2013
- Re: Some general thought on CRIME and Compression and Headers
- Re: Some general thought on CRIME and Compression and Headers
- Re: Some general thought on CRIME and Compression and Headers
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status-02.txt
Friday, 11 January 2013
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Some general thought on CRIME and Compression and Headers
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- HTTPS, proxying, and all that...
Thursday, 10 January 2013
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
- bohe implementation for compression tests
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
- Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
- Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
Tuesday, 8 January 2013
- Re: [editorial] awkward sentence for a MUST statement in section 6.3 Upgrade
- Re: [editorial] awkward sentence for a MUST statement in section 6.3 Upgrade
- [editorial] awkward sentence for a MUST statement in section 6.3 Upgrade
- Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback
Monday, 7 January 2013
- Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
Sunday, 6 January 2013
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
- Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms