Re: SYN_REPLY from Martin Thomson on 2013-02-28 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:15:42 -0800
To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU2MauLaK9qK=x7PoKH+8fhmr-mzi8ZpdDiVmCBJg6+dA@mail.gmail.com>

On 27 February 2013 21:57, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Martin Thomson
> <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Opcode or flags, it matters not.  It depends on where you want to
>> spend your bit (or part thereof).
>
> don't we have 256 opcodes but only 8 flags?

Clearly, that matters :)  Of course, we do have a much larger space
for frame-type-specific flags when it comes down to it.  Potentially
infinite space.

Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 16:16:09 UTC