- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:09:25 +0100
- To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2013-03-19 14:59, Ken Murchison wrote: > Hi all, > > Since the ABNF for token68 appears to only use "=" as padding for base64 > and base32 encoding, I would suggest changing > > *"=" > > to > > *6"=" > > since base64 requires no more than 2 padding chars and base32 requires > no more than 6. > ... We probably could. On the other hand, I'd like to avoid the impression that parsing per ABNF is sufficient to check validity of arguments; therefore, I'm reluctant to put even more information into the ABNF. WDOT? Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 14:09:55 UTC