- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:47 -0800
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Osama Mazahir <OSAMAM@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 22 February 2013 05:29, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > What is the motivation for that? I'm not suggesting that this is Osama's motivation, but look at the Upgrade scenario: the server is the first to send on the HTTP/2.0 session with a response. There's an obvious opportunity there to push prior to the client SETTINGS frame arriving. The TLS scenario is less interesting - the client sends SETTINGS prior to any request, making defaults non-interesting.
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 16:20:14 UTC