- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:01:06 +1100
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I haven't seen any feedback on this, so I'm closing as incorporated. On 11/02/2013, at 5:27 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/223> > > After some discussion with Roy, we've come to the conclusion that the edits I did when I re-wrote the caching part unnecessarily introduced a new aspect of status codes -- whether or not responses carrying it can have a heuristic applied to determine freshness. > > We're currently working through the drafts to pull that back, so that any status code defined as "cacheable" can have a heuristic applied. > > We'll review those edits as part of our next round of drafts; just wanted to give people a heads-up. In parallel, I'm going to open another issue regarding *what* status codes are cacheable by default; this came out of the discussion of #223. > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 00:01:33 UTC