- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:29:34 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 25/01/2013 4:56 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2013-01-24 16:51, Zhong Yu wrote: >> Either a Content-Range ... or a multipart/byteranges Content-Type >> >> This does not clearly define a precedence; maybe we should clarify >> what if both exist. >> >> And other conflicting texts: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21#section-4.1 > > Stop looking at draft 21; it's seriously outdated. -> > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki> Speaking of which what timeframe can we expect a -22 ? Some of us implementing need to be able to point at a reference Draft at least. Amos
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 05:30:10 UTC