- From: 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:57:13 -0800
- To: Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
After reading Nico's reply, I realize I misunderstood your email. Ignore my previous email. On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:49 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JanMar/0357.html > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org> wrote: >> Roberto Peon wrote: >>> The worst part is the high latency, especially given TCP's >>> current cogestion avoidance implementations-- the total number >>> of round-trips ends up dominating latency, regardless of how >>> much bandwidth one has. >> >> Why is this being addressed by trying to make the messages smaller? Wouldn't following the original architecture of HTTP, which was optimized for fewer, larger messages, also reduce latency? >> >> >> Robert Brewer >> fumanchu@aminus.org
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 00:57:40 UTC