- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:22:18 +1100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 19/02/2013, at 2:20 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 18/02/2013 1:04 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Right, and those cases are made clear here: >> >> https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.html#response.cacheability >> >> Closing as incorporated. >> > > one more difficult case is present... > > How to interpret Cache-Control:private,private="foo" > > For now we are going to interpret it as Cache-Control:private in Squid. I think that is the correct interpretation; 'private' without an argument appears in the response, therefore it can't be stored by a shared cache. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 03:22:46 UTC