- From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:19 +0000
- To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
------ Original Message ------ From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Cc: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>; "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Sent: 19/03/2013 12:17:38 a.m. Subject: Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1 >In message <ema8b6f777-7b08-4723-b705-f55ab8fa61af@bombed>, "Adrien W. >de Croy" writes: > >>for instance a cache receiving a request with If-Modified-Since later >>than its own Last-Modified, may presume the client has a later copy, >>and >>discard its own copy. > >Uhm, so you're saying I can clean the entire cache with bogos IMS >requests ? that's not the point. There could be any number of ways a cache could be depending on the current specification which requires that IMS came from a previous LM. We're looking to change that between v20 and v21 just before last call. In a sub-part of the spec. I think it's a non-trivial change, and deserves more discussion, and is possibly beyond the mandate for httpbis. > >That doesn't sound optimal or even sensible to me... > >-- >Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by >incompetence.
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 11:31:44 UTC