- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:28:13 +0000
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -------- In message <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E401FD356@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>, Larry Masinter writes: >The impact was only if those high-performance implementations were using >single IP address for multiple host names. > >(Which would kind of be antithetical to a high-performance deployment, no?) Uhm, have you read this ? http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-553 Even very high performance sites have multiple FQDNs per IP number these days and the Host: header is often more important than the URI, because high-performance load-balancers route HTTP only using that. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:28:35 UTC