- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:26:38 -0400
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: IETF HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le 12 mars 2013 à 19:19, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > The text above discusses length limits and reactions to them; it is not > meant to say anything about other reasons for sending 501. If the server > does not recognise the "YO" method then it should also reply with 501, > as per the definition of the 501 status code. Yes exactly, but then why being specific on the length of the *method*? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-22#section-6.6.2 It seems the spec could get rid of that specific sentence without loosing meaning. -- Karl Dubost http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 23:26:46 UTC