- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:52:18 +0000
- To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -------- In message <CACuKZqHMQdktfOU3PJC=X-G8R=BQ40bhFJw=ZTfeSpem9L=GEw@mail.gmail.com> , Zhong Yu writes: >On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >But how does the 2 ends agree on which encoding to use? It might be >easier if HTTP just dictate UTF-8. But this is a semantic question, I've been told in no uncertain terms that all that was settled in HTTPbis, and that HTTP/2 is only about transport, and that reopening semantic questions was Not To Be Done. Did I misunderstand that ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 10 February 2013 22:52:43 UTC