- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:02:27 -0800
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I'd prefer only a single option also but I want to avoid having to re-encode data when going from http/1 to http/2... I'd like the option of passing stuff through as is when it's appropriate to do so. For the most part, tho, I'd personally prefer UTF-8 only across the board. If we can reach consensus on that point I'd gladly drop the extra bit. - James On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 February 2013 13:55, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Why can't we stick to UTF-8 for text? > > A good question. Conversion to and from ISO-8859-1 is probably easier > than supporting both in protocol. Saves a bit too.
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 23:03:13 UTC