- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:34:35 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 19:35:07 UTC
imho: Seems reasonable for now. I expect that we'll expand the error codes as more implementors find error conditions that they want to be able to debug from a client debug information, at which point we can re-add any of this. -=R On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote: > Another error code question. > > INVALID_STREAM indicates that a frame arrived for an "inactive" stream. > > STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED indicates that a frame arrived for a (half-)closed > stream. > > Both are unexpected frames. My first inclination was to suggest > (again) that a single error code was appropriate. > > However, if I read between the lines, INVALID_STREAM is as a result of > getting a frame prior to the first 'official' frame in the stream > (i.e., SYN_STREAM). But the general design doesn't require that a > stream starts with any particular frame. > > So I conclude that it only makes sense to have STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED. > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 19:35:07 UTC