- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:31:37 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 22/02/2013 12:54 p.m., Roberto Peon wrote: > I mean that SYN_STREAM has a priority, which is mandatory because > without it the browser won't trust the server-side to do the right thing. > SYN_REPLY doesn't have one, because it doesn't need to declare > priority-- the SYN_STREAM already did that, and it is almost always a > waste to include a priority field in SYN_REPLY. When we start rationalizing server-push semantics so multiple replies can be sent for one request. Most of the replies will need to be assigned some lower priority than the requested reply - hopefully all within the one stream. We will have to define a new response frame entirely to replace reply. Why not just do it now and have initial implementations compatible with those later ones? Amos
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 00:32:07 UTC