- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:55:05 +0000
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -------- In message <CAP+FsNdm86+Ti4iJmDy=cKXxc0uvX5KVN0KSUHu=6J0YhL0kzw@mail.gmail.com> , Roberto Peon writes: >Why would I like it if the new and supposedly better stuff is worse with >naive implementations, given that a requirement for a smaller frame size >would likely do a good job of preventing the sucking in the first place? :) So you're actively pushing a very complex protocol, and now you're suddenly worried about "naive implementations" running into trouble ? Doesn't sound very convincing to me... Anyway, I've spent enough time you this non-sense. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 20:55:28 UTC