Re: SYN_REPLY

> > SYN_REPLY doesn't have one, because it doesn't need to declare priority--
> > the SYN_STREAM already did that, and it is almost always a waste to
> include
> > a priority field in SYN_REPLY.
>
> Agree.  So what does SYN_REPLY actually do then?
>
> It contains a HEADERS block and little else. If you're arguing to elide
SYN_REPLY given HEADERS, then sure, I can see that-- the frame fields are
the same now that we've removed the 'in-reply-to' field.

-=R