- From: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:22:10 +0200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
On 1/31/2013 1:28 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > -------- > In message <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E401FD356@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>, Larry Masinter writes: > >> The impact was only if those high-performance implementations were using >> single IP address for multiple host names. >> >> (Which would kind of be antithetical to a high-performance deployment, no?) > > Uhm, have you read this ? > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-553 > > Even very high performance sites have multiple FQDNs per IP number these > days and the Host: header is often more important than the URI, because > high-performance load-balancers route HTTP only using that. > The only reason they use the Host: header is since it's there. It can be simply measured if needed. -- Eliezer Croitoru
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 12:22:54 UTC