#433, was: WGLC issue: ambiguity in part 1 example

On 2013-02-18 01:13, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Thanks, Amos; I've created an editorial ticket -
>    http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/433
>
> Cheers,
> ...

Fixed by keeping the example, but adding a note mentioning the trailing 
CR LF (<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2185>).

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 13:23:06 UTC