- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:42:41 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABP7RbeAtaEoRCvwe-eEzFM2wadZSV7BQcBGViCwgSuBdVwS2A@mail.gmail.com>
Give me about a week and it should be ready to go. I need to get the huffman coding implemented stil and want to take another pass at optimizing everything. On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > No huge changes logically except that the implementation actually uses > canonical huffman codes, as spec'd. > I'm interested in seeing your variation on it with the alternate encoding > types! > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:36 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Excellent. The next step for me then is to update the java implementation >> [1] based on this and get the new value encoding options tied in. I'll >> review in detail later today but are there any major logic changes that >> you've made in the process? It's been about two weeks since I last reviewed >> your implementation. >> >> - James >> >> [1] https://github.com/jasnell/http2 >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I posted an update to the delta header compression I-D yesterday (but >>> failed to put the tags on it that automatically marked it for HTTPbis. >>> *sigh*). >>> >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rpeon-httpbis-header-compression/ >>> >>> I'm sure I've missed things and gotten some wrong, but I'm moderately >>> happy that it is mostly fleshed out. >>> >>> -=R >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 19:43:29 UTC