- From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:29:04 +0000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > >> We can and are working on ways to allow for better detection >> of such MITM attacks, but that's different. > > Yes, fine, cool. > > But how about allowing for them, for instance where they are mandated > by law ? > > (Pornfilters at schools, inmates communications in high security > prisons. Parental control filters in homes.) Where were you when we proposed http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcgrew-tls-proxy-server-01 ? Anyway, in all those cases, wouldn't spyware on the (school-, parent-, or prison-provided) computer do the trick just as well as trusting them to go through a particular proxy? Yoav
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 20:29:36 UTC