- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:46:20 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
One more little experiment; the "first" request, followed by something that a settings frame might look like:
FOO * HTTP/2.0\r\n\r\n\x80\x00\x00\x04\x80\x00\x00\x00
31177 CLOSE
298 CONN_ERR
3673 TIMEOUT
Not too bad.
On 21/02/2013, at 7:02 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
> On 21/02/2013, at 5:12 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> FOO * HTTP/2.0\r\n\r\nBAR\r\n\r\n
>> 31132 CLOSE
>> 427 CONN_ERR
>> 3589 TIMEOUT
>
> That's 25 bytes, btw; shortening to 21:
>
> A * HTTP/2.0\r\n\r\nB\r\n\r\n
> 30520 CLOSE
> 682 CONN_ERR
> 3946 TIMEOUT
>
> ... makes it a bit worse.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 08:46:51 UTC