- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:42:27 +0100
- To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
- CC: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-01-08 16:43, Barry Leiba wrote: > Very good catch, Karl! > >> In section 6.3 Upgrade in Version 21 of messaging >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-21#section-6.3 >> >> For example, if the Upgrade header field >> is received in a GET request and the server >> decides to switch protocols, then it MUST >> first respond with a 101 (Switching Protocols) >> message in HTTP/1.1 and then immediately >> follow that with the new protocol's equivalent >> of a response to a GET on the target resource. >> >> I would drop the "For example", if it's really a MUST. > > I think that's not the right fix, though. It really is an example, > and the MUST is already specified above this. I think the right > answer is to lower-case the "must", or change it to "then it first > responds... and immediately follows that...." Indeed: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2101>. BTW, Roy has been very busy updating Parts 1 and 2, so right now, it's much more useful to review the current edits in SVN (see <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki#HTTP1.1Deliverables>). Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 18:42:57 UTC