- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:29:04 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdV_ROyt-jy0dcwcCgjWrbRedLLV4pADj9TbdC1ytk_Ag@mail.gmail.com>
* Roberto: make detailed proposal for frame size w/ continuation bit: mailed out. On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Add a way to control the size of the state kept. > > Thanks, > > On 06/02/2013, at 8:29 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > You also had a request of me to add a flag to the delta stuff to > optionally do or not do... (I forget) > > -=R > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > I see (or, sometimes, infer) the following action items in the minutes: > > > > * Mark: re-ping the TLS WG for NPN status > > * Eliot: write text for a registry of opaque strings to identify > different things to negotiate for > > * Martin: explain use case for weights in the DNS record > > * Eliot: revise his RR proposal based upon discussion > > * Roberto: revise draft and ship new example code for delta > > * Herve: publish draft and ship example code for headerdiff > > * Roberto / Will / Hasan: assure that SPDY4 changes are raised as issues > for WG to consider, or given to editors if purely editorial > > * Mark: raise a new issue for handing Expect/100-continue > > * Mark: raise a new issue for negotiation of trailers > > * Mark: raise a new issue for indicating the end of a header block > > * Mark: raise a new issue about assuring that routing data (e.g., :host, > :path, :scheme) appears before headers > > * Roberto: make detailed proposal for frame size w/ continuation bit > > * Will: make a detailed proposal for sesion-level flow control. Initial > values to be 64k. > > * Eliot: amend his record to accommodate "initial options" > > * Roberto: forward complete proposal from spdy4 for grouping and > re-prioritisation > > * Hasan: write a proposal for pushpromise; moving associated-to from > synstream to it. > > * Will: double check that spdy's change to directionality for max > streams has made it into http/2, or raise issue. > > * Editors: flesh out security considerations for server push, or note in > new issue > > * Mike B: make proposal on list for security/privacy considerations of > settings. > > * Eliot + Martin: Start discussion of magic on list. DONE > > * Hasan: Send proposal about metrics to gather during testing to list. > > * Mark: Continue discussion of testing / data gathering on list. > > > > Please reply here when you've completed one. And, if I've missed one, > please yell. > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 22:29:32 UTC