- From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:18:18 -0600
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > Will's naming in his email wasn't the best :) > > Flow control in SPDY3 was flawed and didn't work. It was solely per-stream > flow control. Right, that would fail similarly to SSHv2's. > What is proposed in his writeup fixes this flaw relatively simply. The most > relevant line is: > > > It’s important to recognize that stream and session flow control serve two > separate roles. Session flow control helps manage the memory consumption per > session, whereas stream flow control helps manage what portion of that that > memory an individual stream is allowed consume. Ah, excellent and very clever. I believe that should work. > I suggest reading the doc, though! Sure. Thanks for picking just the right paragraph to quote. Nico --
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 07:18:41 UTC