- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:19:54 +0100
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:15:30AM -0800, Roberto Peon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Martin Thomson > <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On 27 February 2013 10:51, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Then you can't do websockets, etc or whatever other protocol (maybe > > video?, > > > who knows) the web platform decides to do in the future on the same > > > socket/session. > > > > Not true. Write another RFC that says how you can share the > > connection with websockets. That might have to change some of the > > rules, loosen some of the constraints, add some features. > > > > We have enough to do here without worrying about it, but there you go. > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUEFzz7NCls3Yms8hXxY4wGXJ3EEvoZc3GihrqPQcM0/edit Did not see this one, it goes exactly in the direction I proposed for having SPDY being the framing layer and HTTP the semantics layer :-) Willy
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 07:20:26 UTC