- From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:15:36 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 3/19/13 10:09 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2013-03-19 14:59, Ken Murchison wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Since the ABNF for token68 appears to only use "=" as padding for base64 >> and base32 encoding, I would suggest changing >> >> *"=" >> >> to >> >> *6"=" >> >> since base64 requires no more than 2 padding chars and base32 requires >> no more than 6. >> ... > > We probably could. On the other hand, I'd like to avoid the impression > that parsing per ABNF is sufficient to check validity of arguments; > therefore, I'm reluctant to put even more information into the ABNF. > > WDOT Hi Julian, If consensus is to leave it completely generic, I won't lose any sleep over it. -- Kenneth Murchison Principal Systems Software Engineer Carnegie Mellon University
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 14:16:04 UTC